Advocates:
['SHRI ATUL P VANARSE', 'SHRI MANDAR LIMAYE', '', 'SHRI MANDAR LIMAYE', 'AND']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SECOND APPEAL (St.) NO. 20911 OF 2007

Hanmanta Timma Pujari since deceased by his

legal heirs Smt.Hirabai Hanmanta Pujari & Ors. ............ Appellants

V/s

Narhari Bnalku Kavade since deceased by his legal

heirs Shankar Narhari Kavade & Ors. ......

...... ...... Respondents.

Mr.A.P.Vanarse, Adv. For the appellants.

Mr.Mandar Limaye, Adv. For respondent Nos.3, 5, 7 and 9.

Mr.A.B.Tajane, Adv. For respondent No.7-d.

CORAM: R.V. MORE, J.

25^th NOVEMBER, 2008.

PC:

Heard learned advocates for respective parties.

The appellants are the original defendants and respondents are

the original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.458/07. Suit was filed

for possession of the suit land after removal of appellant' s

encroachment over the suit property. Both the Courts below

concurrently upheld ownership and title of the respondents-plaintiffs.

It was also held that the appellants are in unauthorized possession of

the suit property. These findings are recorded after appreciating the

evidence on record. Appreciation of evidence cannot be said to be

perverse. No question of law, much less substant