Vishal Gopichand Tilore vs The State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, J
Vishal Gopichand Tilore – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellant/Petitioners: Mrs. Anjali Patil, Mr. Abdeali Kothawala
For the Respondents: Mr. S.V. Gavand, Mrs. Savita Yadav

Table of Content
1. initial context of the case and the crime. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments presented by both sides regarding witness credibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. discussion on the reliability of victim testimony. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. medical evidence and its implications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. reinforcement of victim's credibility and corroborating evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. conclusion and decision on appeal. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

. This Appeal assails the judgment and order dated 18/05/2017 delivered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.429/2016. By the impugned judgment, the learned Judge has held the Appellant and the co-accused guilty of offences under Section 452 , 376(D), 506(2), 323 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced as under:-

(i) imprisonment for 20 years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- in default simple imprisonment for six months for offence punishable under Sections 376(d);

(ii) rigorous imprisonment for 07 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for offence punishable under Section 452 of IPC (iii) Rigorous imprisonment for 07 ye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURTSmt. Anuja Prabhudessai, JVishal Gopichand Tilore – AppellantVersusThe State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, J
Vishal Gopichand Tilore – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent