HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
DR. SHRI. KIRAN DADASO SALUNKHE – Appellant
Versus
DR. SHRI. ANIL DINKAR HUDDEDAR AND ORS – Respondent
WP 6096/2022
['AMRUTA DEEPAK DEVKAT', 'PRAJAKT M ARJUNWADKAR', '', 'NO', 'Asha N Gunjal']
Tikam
1/2
26-WP 6096 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 6096 OF 2022
Dr. Shri Kiran Dadaso Salunkhe
...Petitioner
Vs.
Dr. Shri Anil Dinkar Huddear
and Ors.
...Respondents
* * * *
Mr. Vikas Kolekar i/b. Amruta D. Devkat for Petitioner
Mr. Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar for Respondent No.1
Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J.
Dated: 22
nd August, 2022.
P.C. :
1.
The Learned Second Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division,
Sangli vide order dated 29th August,2017 below Exhibit ‘41’ in
Special Civil Suit No. 66/2016 set aside 'No WS', order subject to
Defendant No.6- Petitioner, pays cost of Rs.1,000/- to the
Plaintiff. Approximately after ten months, on 8th June, 2018,
Petitioner- Defendant No.6, moved an application, requesting the
Trial Court to permit him to deposit the cost. That application
was rejected vide order dated 8th June, 2018. Felling aggrieved
thereby, Petitioner – Defendant No.6 has preferred this writ
petition.
VAISHALI
ANIL
TIKAM
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
2022.08.23
10:18:20
+0530
Tikam
2/2
26-WP 6096 of 2022
2.
Heard Mr. Kolekar, learned counsel for the Petitioner
and Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, learned counsel for the
Respondent- Plaintiff.
3.
Mr. Arjunwadkar has pointed out that the Petitioner
has not sought the relief to set aside the 'No WS' order and the
only challenge before this Court is the order refusing permission
to deposit the cost.
4.
Be that as it may, in consideration of the facts of the
case, I deem it appropriate to permit and allow the Petitioner -
Defendant No.6 to file the written statement within two weeks
from today subject to cost of Rs.10,000/- to be paid to the
Plaintiff by Demand draft. on or before 5th September, 2022. In
case, the Petitioner does not pay the cost and/or present the
written statement within the stipulated period, this order shall
stand recalled without further reference to this Court and in
consequence, petition to stand dismissed.
5.
Writ Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(Sandeep K. Shinde, J.)