SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RANJEET CHINU THAKUR @ RANJEET KUMAR CHUNNU KUMAR THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1/5 42 BA 3447-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3447 OF 2021

Ranjeet Chinu Thakur

@ Ranjeet Kumar

.. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

Mr. Atin Pathan with Rafiq, Danyaal Tahsildar for the applicant.

Mr.P.H. Gaikwad, APP for the State.

ASI Vishnu Parab from Gorai police station present.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 1st MARCH, 2022

P.C:-

1

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned

APP for the State.

2

The applicant is charge-sheeted in connection with

C.R.No.31 of 2021 registered with Gorai police station

u/s.376(2)(n), 354D, 325, 500, 504, 506 IPC and Section 66C,

67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. With the

assistance of the learned counsel for the applicant, I have perused

the application along with the charge-sheet which compile the

material of investigation conducted in the present C.R.

Tilak

2/5 42 BA 3447-21.doc

The case of the prosecution is to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top