HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SUBHASH KUNDALIK KHADE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
BA 3643/2021
1 of 5 35.BA.3643.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3643 OF 2021
Subhash Kundalik Khade
Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Mr.Priyal G. Sarda, Advocate for applicant.
Ms.P.N.Dabholkar, APP, for State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 6th October 2022
PC :
1.
This is an application u/s.439 of Code of Criminal Procedure.
The applicant was arrested on 17th September 2017 in connection
with CR No.183 of 2017 registered with Bharti Vidypeeth Police
Station. He was granted bail by order dated 3rd November 2017.
Subsequently provisions of Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes
Act were applied. Hence applicant was again arrested on 16th April
2018 and since then he is in custody.
2.
Initially, C.R. No. 183 of 2017, was registered on 11th April,
2017, with Bharti Vidhyapeeth Police Station, Pune, for offences
punishable under Section 224 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code.
The said FIR was lodged by Sanjay Chandanshiv, police head
constable. He was assigned duty as Guard Amaldar incharge. It was
alleged that the accused No.1 Raju Mahadeo Patre, accused No.2
Santosh Machindra Jagtap, accused No.3 Lubbya @ Santosh
Chintaman Chandilkar were detained at Yerawada Central Prison.
They were to be produced before the Court of Judicial Magistrate
MANISH
SURESH
THATTE
Digitally signed by
MANISH SURESH
THATTE
Date: 2022.10.10
11:06:11 +0530
2 of 5 35.BA.3643.2021.doc
First Class, Khandala, District-Satara on 10th April, 2017, from
Yerawada Prison. They proceeded by van. They reached the Court
at 14:00 p.m. The case was adjourned to 21st April, 2017. Accused
were to be taken back to Yerawada prison. They proceeded towards
Yerawada Jail. Accused were not handcuffed. While they reached
Katraj Ghat, vehicle was stopped as accused wanted to answer
nature’
s call. Accused got down from vehicle. They pushed police
party and managed to escape in jungle by taking advantage of
darkness. Police chased them but could not trace them.
3.
Subsequently, First Information Report was registered with
Pimpri Chinchwad Police Station, Pune, since it was revealed that the
incident had occurred within the jurisdiction of said police station
vide C.R. No. 352 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections
224, 34 of IPC. The FIR is dated 23rd June, 2017. Thereafter,
Section 115 read with Sections 302, 219 and 223 read with Section
3, 5 and 25 were added. Sections 212, 216, 219, 223, 225, 414 and
419 of IPC were also added. Approval for invoking provisions of
MCOC Act was granted on 8th November, 2017. Sanction was
granted on 8th March, 2018, under provisions of Section 3(1)(II),
3(2), 3(3) and 3(4) of MCOC Act.
4.
During the course of investigation, it was revealed that the
accused Sushil Mancharkar is involved in politics. He came in
contact with the gang leader Santosh @ Lubhya Chandilkar. Sushil
Mancharkar wanted to liquidate Kailas Kadam. There was a
conspiracy by him. The persons who escaped from the custody were
contacted and contract was given to them to kill Kailas Kadam. The
co-accused Sushil Mancharkar activated the proceedings in the court
3 of 5 35.BA.3643.2021.doc
at Khandala. The accused No.10 Vijay Waghmare working as Police
Naik was entrusted work of allotment of police personal for taking
accused persons to Courts from the jail. It was ensured that same
police personals are deputed for taking accused No.1, accused No.2
and accused No.15 to the Court from the jail. The accused had
appeared in the trial Court for about 11 dates. With the assistance of
the police, the accused managed to flee from custody. However,
subsequently, they were arrested and arraigned accus