Back
APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J
Delux Polymer Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common questions of law and facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. allegations of malafide and authority issues (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. trial court's rejection of motions (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. appellants' justification of structures' legality (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. court's analysis of risk and legal authority (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. factual context of constructions (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. details of specific appeals against notices (Para 23 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. unauthorized structures and change of user (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. legal standing of unauthorized constructions (Para 40 , 41) |
| 10. procedural compliance of demolition orders (Para 42 , 43 , 49) |
| 11. malafides and authority relevance (Para 56 , 60) |
| 12. final judgment outcome and denial of status-quo (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77) |
1. As all these Appeals raise common questions of law and facts, they are being decided by this common Judgment.
2. They pertain to the structures situate in the precincts of 'Raghuvanshi Mill', Parel, Mumbai and are arising out of the common order passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, thereby dismissing various Notices of Motions taken out by the Appellants herein, seeking the relie
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
