SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUMANMAL S/O BAKHTAVARMAL RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
NILESH FATECHAND PORWAL AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['GANESH BHUJBAL', 'RAJESH JAIN', '', 'RESPONDENT NO', 'RESPONDENT NO', 'KAMLESH JAIN', 'MANOJ VISHWAKARMA']

Osk

10-Wp-3912-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3912 OF 2019

Gumanmal Bakhtavarmal Rathod

]

Aged 44 years, Residing at 64/64/A,

]

Shaikh Memon Street, 3rd floor,

]

Near Bhagat Tarachand, Mumbai – 400 002.

]

… Petitioner

V/s.

1.

Nilesh Fatechand Porwal

]

Tarabaug, Sapna Apartment,

]

Ground floor, Love Lane, Byculla,

]

Mumbai – 400 027.

]

2.

Mukesh Tulsichand Jain

]

Residing at Shivaml Building,

]

“B” Wing, 2nd floor, Room No.218,

]

10th Kamathipura, Mumbai – 400 008.

]

3.

The State of Maharashtra

]

4.

Heena Mukesh Jain

]

Residing at Shivaml Building,

]

“B” Wing, 2nd floor, Room No.218,

]

10th Kamthipura, Mumbai – 400 008.

]

… Respondents

Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for Petitioner.

Mr. Kamlesh Jain for Respondent No.1.

Mr. Rajesh Jain for Respondent No.2.

Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik, A.P.P. for Respondent No.3-State.

Mr. Prabhanjay Dave a/w. Mr.Ankit Rajput i/b. Mr.Manoj Vishwakarma for

Respondent No.4.

CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 13th June 2022.

1/7

Osk

10-Wp-3912-2019.odt

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1.

By the present Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India, the Petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top