SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
RAJENDRA SITARAM GOEL AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
JAI ENTERPRISES AND ASSOCIATES AND ORS – Respondent


44. WP 6645-2022.doc

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION 6645 OF 2022

Rajendra Sitaram Goel & anr.

.Petitioners

Vs.

Jai Enterprises & Associates & ors.

.Respondents

Mr. Jaydeep S. Deo, Advocate, for the Petitioners

Mr. Rahul S. Kadam, Advocate, for the Respondents

CORAM

:

ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE

:

12.07.2022

P. C.

.

At the oral request of the Petitioners, leave to

amend the prayer clauses of the Petition. Amendment be

carried out forthwith.

2.

The Petitioner is the Plaintiff in Spl. Civil Suit 200

of 2011 which is brought for specifc performance of MOU

dated 11.07.2006.

3.

The suit property is described as land

admeasuring 4.67 HR situtated at Wakad, Pune.

1 of 6

44. WP 6645-2022.doc

4.

For the purpose of deciding the issue involved, it

would not be necessary to consider in detail the suit

averments or the defence.

5.

The Plaintiffs preferred an Application seeking

amendment of plaint ( Exh. 119) under the provisions of O.

VII, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and

Sections 21 and 22 of the Specifc Relief Act, 1963, which is

only partly allowed by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top