SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
CHINMAY SHRIDHAR SUBHEDAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


23-apl-940-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 940 OF 2021

Chinmay Shridhar Subhedar and anr.

…Appellants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

…Respondents

…......

Mr. Omkar P. Mulukar for the Appellants.

Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the State.

Mr. M. V. Rajput for Respondent No.2.

…......

CORAM

:

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE

:

19 SEPTEMBER 2022.

P.C. :-

This appeal is filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes

and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (“SCST

Act” for short) against an order passed by learned Special Judge,

Satara dated 30 October 2021 in Criminal Bail Application No. 641

of 2021.

2.

By the order impugned, the trial Court rejected the anticipatory

bail application filed by the present appellants, who are accused in

C.R. No. 387 of 2021 registered with Shahapuri Police Station, Satara

for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 354, 504, 506

read with Section 34 of IPC and under Sections 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(va),

MJ Jadhav

1 / 4

23-apl-940-21.odt

3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention

of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

3.

On 25 Novembe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top