SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SUNITA ANILKUMAR SHINDE (MS. SUNITA SHIVRAM SHELKE) – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent
WP 1762/2022



16.5598.22-wp+.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.5598 OF 2022

Uttam Ramchandra Chougule

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.6476 OF 2022

Ganpati Rajaram Shinde @ Ganpati

Rajaram Chougule

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.1762 OF 2022

Mrs.Sunita Anilkumar Shinde

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.5600 OF 2022

Shri Uttam Nana Kamble

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

Mohite

1/4

TRUSHA

TUSHAR

MOHITE

Digitally

signed by

TRUSHA

TUSHAR

MOHITE

Date:

2022.07.19

18:36:00

+0530

16.5598.22-wp+.docx

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.725 OF 2022

Shri Ajitkumar Baburao Patil

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.722 OF 2022

Shri Kisan Lahu Gavali

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.724 OF 2022

Shri Sunil Vasant Chavan

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.5603 OF 2022

Shri Sandip Balkrishna Mohire

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

Mohite

2/4

16.5598.22-wp+.docx

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.6478 OF 2022

Shri Rajkumar Mahadeo Kamble

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.6479 OF 2022

Smt.Asha Ramchandra Bhandwalkar

….. Petitioner

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

….. Respondents

Mr. Mandar Bagkar i/b Mr.Vinayak Kumbhar for the Petitioner

Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar i/b Ms.Ashwini Bandiwadekar for Respondent

nos.6 and 7

Mr.S.B.Kalel, A.G.P. for the Respondent nos.1 to 5

CORAM:

S.V. GANGAPURWALA &

S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATED :

JULY 18, 2022

P.C.

1

The learned counsel submits that the petitioners are working

as teaching and non-teaching employees with Respondent no.7 Night

School. They have necessary workload. As such, are required to be

Mohite

3/4

16.5598.22-wp+.docx

treated as full time employee in view of G.R.dated 17.05.2017.

2

The learned counsel appears for Respondent nos.6 and 7 and

submits that the management would submit the proposal to the

Education of昀椀cer in that regard within six weeks from today.

Statement is accepted.

3

After the proposal is received by Respondent no.5, Respondent

no.5 shall process the said proposals received from Respondent no.7

seeking bene昀椀t of G.R. dated 17.05.2017 and if he is competent, shall

take decision upon it within 3 months from the date of receiving the

proposal and if he is required to forward the proposal to the higher

authorities, then shall forward the same within 3 months. The

Higher Authorities shall complete the process expeditiously.

4

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

(S. M. MODAK,J.)

(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

Mohite

4/4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top