Keraba Hanumant Lonkar (Since deceased through his LRs) vs Ramesh Gopalrao Jadhav and Ors.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
M. S. SONAK, J
Keraba Hanumant Lonkar (Since deceased through his LRs) – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Gopalrao Jadhav and Ors. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. R.A. Thorat, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Prabhanjan Gujar
For the Respondents: Mr. Drupad Patil

Table of Content
1. initial discussions of the parties' positions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments against co-plaintiff status. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's ruling on impleadment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. final conclusions and orders of the court. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1. Heard Mr. R.A. Thorat, learned senior advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Drupad Patil, learned counsel for Respondent No. 4A.

2. Mr. Thorat, learned counsel for the Petitioners state that Respondent No. 35 who is really a contesting Respondent has been serve3d and this Respondent has also filed his reply in this Petition.

3. The Respondent No. 35 is not present today though the matter is listed on board and even though by order dated 30th November, 2015 this Court in paragraph No. 5 of the order has made it clear that this Petition will be disposed of finally at the stage of admission. Paragraph No. 5 of the order dated 30th November, 2015 reads thus:

1. Not on Board. At the request of Mr. Gujar, taken up in production board. Heard Mr.R.A.Thorat, learned senior counsel for the petitioners.

2. By this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , original plaintiffs have challenged the judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURTM. S. SONAK, JKeraba Hanumant Lonkar (Since deceased through his LRs) – AppellantVersusRamesh Gopalrao Jadhav and Ors. – Respondent

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
M. S. SONAK, J
Keraba Hanumant Lonkar (Since deceased through his LRs) – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Gopalrao Jadhav and Ors. – Respondent