HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MADHUKAR NARAYAN GAIKWAD AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
IA 2/2022
27-ia.2.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2022
(FOR GRANT OF BAIL)
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2022
1.
Madhukar Narayan Gaikwad
2.
Bramhadeo Abaji Gaikwad
3.
Sunil Hari Gaikwad
4.
Balu Rajaram Gaikwad
5.
Maruti Narayan Gaikwad
6.
Madhav Gajendra Salunkhe
7.
Pandurang Narayan Gaikwad
8.
Bandu Hari Gaikwad
9.
Sadashiv Narayan Gaikwad
10.
Hanumant Narayan Gaikwad
11.
Pailwan Navnath Gaikwad
12.
Ganpat Pandurang Gaikwad
13.
Vaijnath Navnath Gaikwad
14.
Raosaheb Bramhadeo Gaikwad
15.
Mahadeo Gajendra Salunkhe
...Applicants
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Sanjeev Kadam i/b Mr. Purushottam G. Chavan, for the Applicants.
Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1– State.
Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 12th JANUARY 2022
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
N. S. Chitnis
1/5
NISHA
SANDEEP
CHITNIS
Digitally signed by
NISHA SANDEEP
CHITNIS
Date: 2022.01.13
16:43:42 +0530
27-ia.2.2022.doc
P.C. :
1.
Learned Counsel for the applicants seeks leave to amend to
implead the complainant, as party respondent No.2. Leave granted.
Amendment to be carried out during the course of the day.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3.
By this application, the applicants seek suspension of their
sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal
of the aforesaid Revision Application.
4.
The applicants vide Judgment and Order dated 24th April 2013,
passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (4th), Pandharpur, in
R.C.C. No.74 of 1999 have been convicted for the offences punishable
under Section 342 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 387 r/w 149
of the Indian Penal Code; Section 427 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code;
Section 323 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 504 r/w 149 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 506 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code.
N. S. Chitnis
2/5
27-ia.2.2022.doc
The maximum sentence imposed is for the offence punishable under
Section 387 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code i.e. rigorous imprisonment
for three years with fine. Being aggrieved by the said Judgment and Order
of conviction and sentence, the applicants preferred an appeal before the
Sessions Court. The learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge,
Pandharpur, vide Judgment and Order dated 16th December 2021 dismissed
the applicants appeal i.e. Criminal Appeal No.24 of 2013 and Criminal
Appeal No.46 of 2016. It is informed that the appeal filed by the State was
also dismissed.
5.
It is not in dispute that the applicants were on bail pending
trial as well as during the pendency of their appeals and have not misused
or abused the liberty granted to them. The Revision Application has been
admitted by a separate order passed today and the same is not likely to
come up for the hearing in the immediate near future. The sentence
awarded is a short term sentence.
6.
Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the
applicants sentence is suspended and they are enlarged on bail, pending the
N. S. Chitnis
3/5
27-ia.2.2022.doc
hearing and final disposal of the aforesaid Revision, on the following terms
and conditions :
ORDER
i)
The Applicants be released on cash bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/-
each, for a period of six weeks;
ii)
The Applicants shall within the said period of six weeks, furnish
P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties in th