HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SURAJ ARUN POTE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
BA 19/2022
1 / 11
09-BA-19-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2022
Suraj Arun Pote
.... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra
.... Respondent
…....
•
Mr.Nitin Sejpal, Advocate for Applicant.
•
Smt. Aruna S. Pai (Chief PP) a/w Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for
the State/Respondent.
CORAM
: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE
: 09th FEBRUARY, 2022
(through video conferencing)
P.C. :
1.
The Applicant is seeking his release on bail under the
provisions of section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (for short ‘
Cr.P.C.’) r/w section 21(4) of the The
Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (for short
‘MCOC Act’) in respect of C.R.No.97 of 2021 registered with
Meghwadi Police Station.
2.
Heard Mr.Nitin Sejpal, learned counsel for the
Applicant and Smt. Aruna S. Pai, learned Chief PP for the State.
Nesarikar
MANUSHREE
V
NESARIKAR
Digitally
signed by
MANUSHREE
V
NESARIKAR
Date:
2022.02.11
16:39:50
+0530
2 / 11
09-BA-19-22.odt
3.
It is not necessary to go into the merits of the matter
because the Applicant is seeking bail for non filing of the charge-
sheet within the stipulated period. The merit in this matter is not
of much importance. However, the basic facts which are
admitted by both the parties are necessary to be mentioned.
4.
The FIR vide C.R.No.97/2021 was registered at
Meghwadi police station on 18/04/2021 u/s 326, 188, 143,
144, 147, 148, 149, 120(B) r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and
also under the provisions of Maharashtra Police Act.
Subsequently section 307 of the IPC was also added. The
Applicant came to be arrested on 20/05/2021 in this
connection. The investigation was carried out and the charge-
sheet was filed on 05/08/2021. The learned Magistrate took
cognizance and committed the case to the Court of Sessions. On
18/08/2021, the approval u/s 23(1)(a) was granted to apply
provisions of MCOC Act.
5.
The appointed Investigating Officer under that
approval sought custody of the Applicant by making application
3 / 11
09-BA-19-22.odt
before the learned Special Judge under MCOC. The permission
was granted on 23/10/2021 and on that day the Applicant was
shown arrested for commission of offence under the MCOC Act.
The learned Special Judge for MCOC granted police custody to
the Applicant. On 28/10/2021 jail custody was granted. On
17/11/2021 the Applicant moved an application for default bail
under the provisions of 167(2) of Cr.P.C. Learned Special Judge
under MCOC rejected that application on 22/12/2021 and
thereafter the Applicant has filed the present application before
this Court on 30/12/2021. After filing of this application, the
competent authority granted sanction u/s 23(2) of MCOC Act on
18/01/2022 and the charge-sheet showing MCOC offence was
filed on 19/01/2022.
6.
Learned counsel for the Applicant Mr.Sejpal submitted
that the investigating agency was duty bound to file the charge-
sheet within a period of 180 days from the first remand of the
Applicant. For that purpose the date of first remand should have
been taken as 20/05/2021. Therefore according to Mr.Sejpal
4 / 11
09-BA-19-22.odt
right accrued to him u/s 167 of Cr.P.C for being released on
default bail from 16/11/2021. The record produced by the
learned APP shows that the application for default was filed on
17/11/2021.
7.
According to Mr.Sejpal this was outside the outer limit
for filing of the charge-sheet and therefore the Applicant
deserves to be released on bail under the provisions of section
167 of Cr.P.C. Mr.Sejpal relied on the judgment of the Hon’
ble
Supreme Court passed in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs.
Bharati Chandmal Varma, as reported in 2002 Supreme Court
Cases (Cri.) 299. He submitted that this judgment supports the
contention that the outer limit for filing the chargesheet has to
be calculated from the date of first remand and not from the
date when the MCOC provisions were applied or from the date
when the accused is re-arrest