SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S. S. SHINDE, J
Harishchandra Sakharam Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Krushna Gharat – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. C. G. Gavnekar, Mr. Suhas Deokar
For the Respondents: Mr. Rohit D. Joshi

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1.With the consent of the counsel appearing for the parties, taken up for final hearing.

2 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3 This petition takes exception to the impugned Judgment and Order dated 10/09/2018 passed by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai ('MRT' for short) in Application/for Condonation of Delay in TNC/REV/RAG/L-123 OF 2017, thereby condoning the delay of 6 years and three days in preferring the Revision Application.

4 Brief facts as disclosed in the petition are as under: (I) The Petitioner filed Special Civil Suit No. 221 of 2008 against the Vendor of the Respondent Ganesh Gunaji Jadhav for declaration. By an order of the Civil Court, the said Ganesh Jadhav was restrained from conveying the property to the Third Party.

(II) Sub-Divisional Officer on the basis of Application made by Petitioner cancelled Sale Permission granted in favour of the respondent by an order dated 25/06/2009. In an Appeal preferred by Respondent, the matter was remanded.

(III) On remand, Sub-Divisional Officer dismissed the Appeal and confirmed the Order.

(IV) The Appeal by the Respondents against Order dated 15/01/2010 of the Sub-Divisional Officer came to be dismissed.

(V) Civ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top