BOMBAY HIGH COURT
A. M. BADAR, J
Deepak Tukaram Sanas – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to bail application (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding severity of the case (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of offence definition under the act (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally considering the fact that the appeal is challenging order of the Special Judge, Satara, thereby rejecting criminal bail application No.841/2018 filed by appellant/accused claiming pre-arrest bail in Crime No.262/2018, registered at Koregaon Police Station, at the instance of respondent No.2 Rupesh Sitaram Sapkal for offences punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) and 6 of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as well as Sections 504 and 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant/accused. He drew my attention to several complaints lodged by respondent no.2/first informant against the appellant/accused and contended that the appellant/accused is Sarpanch of the village and respondent no.2/first informant is sharing hostile relations with him. It is also pointed out that the appellant/accused had lodged complaint dated 10.9.2018 against respondent no.2/first
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.