Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J
M/s. J.B.D. Finance and Investment Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of property attachment due to complaints. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's duty to assess justifiable cause for late applications. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. limitations on applications under section 85 can be relaxed with sufficient cause. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
Judgment : -
1. Rule.
2. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard, finally with the consent of the parties.
3. These petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , are directed against the order dated 21st November, 2019 (a common order) by which the Petitioners’ application, for release and the restoration of property attached under Section 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , has been rejected by the Metropolitan Magistrate 28th Court at Esplanade Mumbai.
4. Background facts are ;
The Respondent No.2 – M/s Sampark Marketing Advertising Solution Pvt. Ltd. filed complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the Petitioner Company, being Case Nos. CC/447/SS/2005; CC/448/SS/2005; CC/449/SS/2005; CC/450/SS/2005; CC/451/SS/2005; CC/27/SS/2013. In these complaints proclamation was issued against Dinesh Singh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
