1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

SUIT NO.57 OF 1984

Bank of Maharashtra

.. Plaintiff

Versus

M/s.Attempt Engineering & Ors. .. Defendants

WITH

SUIT NO.58 OF 1984

Bank of Maharashtra

.. Plaintiff

Versus

M/s.Attempt Engineering & Ors. .. Defendants.

Mr.Sunil

Shewale

i/b.

Ghanekar

&

Co.

for

plaintiff

None for defendants.

2

CORAM :

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.

DATE

:

4th December 2008

P.C.

.

In this suit after the plaint and written

statement were perused, issues were framed on

23rd February 2006 and directions were given for

filing of affidavit of documents.

2.

It is clear from the order passed by me

on 10th November 2008 that at the stage of

framing of issues defendants were represented by

an Advocate.

3.

Subsequently, when the affidavit of

documents and originals along with compilation

were to be filed so also affidavit in lieu of

examination in chief, the defendants were not

present and even their Advocate was not

available. In such circumstances, I have

3

reecorded in my earleir orders that