BOMBAY HIGH COURT - ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAY
RAMANI RAMANATHAN S/O RAMALINGAM RAMANATHAN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
R. NAGALAKSHMI @ RAMNATHAN NAGALAKSHMI @ RAMANATHAN NAGALAKSHMI (DECEASED) – Respondent
MPT 31/2022
915.MPT.31.22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 31 OF 2022
R. Nagalakshmi alias Ramnathan
Nagalakshmi alias Ramanathan Nagalakshmi
…
Deceased
And
Ramani Ramanathan S/o.
Ramalingam Ramanathan & Anr.
…
Petitioners
Ms. P.M. Bhansali a/w Mr. Manoj Mane for the Petitioners.
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J.
DATED : 29th APRIL, 2022.
ORDER :
1
By the present Petition, the Petitioners seeks a Legal Heirship
Certificate under Section 2 of Bombay Regulation Act, VIII of 1827 in
respect of the deceased Ramanathan Nagalakshmi who expired at
Mumbai on 14.05.2015. A copy of the death certificate is annexed at
Exhibit-A to the Petition. The deceased was survived by the five legal
heirs and next of kins, the particulars of which are given in the tabular
form at paragraph 4 of the Petition, namely the two sons who are the
Petitioners and three married daughters. Save and except the legal heirs
Waghmare
1/3
915.MPT.31.22.doc
mentioned in tabular form at paragraph 4, there are no other legal heirs
or next of kins left by the deceased.
2
It is stated in paragraph 9 of the Petition that the Legal
Heirship Certificate is required to produce before the MHADA for transfer
of tenancy rights in respect to Tenement No.70, Aram Nagar Part-I, Near
Jain Temple, 7 Bungalows, Andheri (W), Mumbai 400 061, in the names
of the Petitioners.
3
There are consent affidavits filed by the other legal heirs of
the deceased who are the married daughters of the deceased and which
are at pages 20 to 28 of the Petition. By the consent affidavits the other
legal heirs of the deceased have given their full and free consent for
issuance of Legal Heirship Certificate of the deceased in favour of the
Petitioners, without service of any proclamation upon them and without
justifying any surety for their share in the property left by the deceased.
4
No other Petition for legal heirship certificate, succession
certificate, probate or letters of administration with or without will
annexed has been filed. I do not find any impediment in granting the
relief sought for in the present Petition.
Waghmare
2/3
915.MPT.31.22.doc
5
The Petition is accepted and made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a) which reads thus :
“a.
That a Legal Heirship Certificate be issued under the
provision of Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827,
Certifying that (1) Ramani Ramanathan S/o. Ramalingam
Ramanathan (Son of the Deceased and Petitioner No.1
herein), (2) Sridhar Ramanathan S/o. Ramalingam
Ramanathan (Son of the Deceased and the Petitioner No.2
herein), (3) Lalitha Venkatachalam (Married Daughter of
the Deceased), (4) Padma Srinivasan (Married Daughter of
the Deceased) and (5) Geeta Mani (Married Daughter of
the Deceased) are the only heirs and Legal representative
of the Deceased.”
6
Proclamation is dispensed with.
7
The Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly disposed of. No
order as to costs.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.)
Waghmare
3/3
WAISHALI
SUSHIL
WAGHMARE
Digitally signed
by WAISHALI
SUSHIL
WAGHMARE
Date:
2022.05.02
18:00:26 +0530
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.