- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.2037 OF 1992

Shri Vishnu Ramchandra Joshi, )

54/11, Shankar Kutir, )

Second Floor, Sion (East), )

Bombay - 400 022. ).. Petitioner

Versus

1. Maharashtra State Textile )

Corporation Ltd., )

A Government of Maharashtra )

Undertaking, 33A, Lotus House,)

First Floor, Sir Vithaldas )

Thakersey Marg, )

New Marine Lines, )

Bombay - 400 020. )

2. Shri Prakash Kallappa Awade, )

Chairman, M.S.T.C. Ltd., )

33-A, Lotus House, )

First Floor, Sir Vithaldas )

Thakersey Marg, New Marine )

Lines, Bombay - 400 020. )

3. Shri Rakesh Chandra Joshi, )

Managing Director, )

M.S.T.C. Ltd., 33-A, )

Lotus House, First Floor, )

Sir Vithaldas Thackersey )

Marg, New Marine Lines, )

Bombay - 400 020. )

4. Western India Spg.& Mfg.Mills )

Dattaram Lad Path, )

Kalachowki, Bombay - 400 033. )

5. Shri P.G.Sukhtankar, )

General Manager, )

Western India Spg.& Mfg.Mills )

Dattaram Lad Path, )

Kalachowki, Bombay - 400 033. ).. Respondents

--

- 2 -

Shri S.N.Deshpande for the petitioner.

Shri I.A.Sayyed for the respondents.

--

CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &

V.M.KANADE, JJ.

DATED : 23rd AUGUST, 2005.

ORAL JUDGMENT : ( Per R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J )

ORAL JUDGMENT : ( Per R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J )

ORAL JUDGMENT : ( Per R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J )

1. Heard. The petitioner seeks relief in the

nature of direction to the respondents to pay all the

dues payable to the petitioner pursuant to the order

passed by the respondents terminating the services of

the petitioner with effect from 18th November, 1991.

Though initially the petition was filed challenging

the order of dismissal, the learned Advocate appearing

for the petitioner has restricted the challenge to the

dues payable by the respondents to the petitioner,

consequent to the termination of his services. Being

so, it is not necessary to go into the issue regarding

the legality of the order of termination of service of

the petitioner.

2. Pursuant to the order of termination dated

18th November, 1991, the petitioner through his lawyer

- 3 -

served a notice upon the respondents calling upon the

respondents to pay all his legal dues, such as,

Gratuity, Medical Reimbursement Allowance,

Hospitalisation Charges, Leave Encashment, Family

Pension, etc., as inspite of his earlier r