SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAY
KISHANLAL M. DAGLIYA – Appellant
Versus
PALESHKUMAR B. DHAKAD – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S N N VAISHNAWA', 'CO', '', 'S J GHOGARE']

-1-

IN

IN

IN

THE

THE

THE

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

ORDINARY

ORDINARY

ORDINARY

ORIGINAL

CIVIL

JURISDICTION

ORIGINAL

CIVIL

JURISDICTION

ORIGINAL

CIVIL

JURISDICTION

NOTICE

NOTICE

NOTICE

OF

OF

OF

MOTION

NO.997

OF

2005

MOTION

NO.997

OF

2005

MOTION

NO.997

OF

2005

IN

IN

IN

SUMMONS

SUMMONS

SUMMONS

FOR

FOR

FOR

JUDGMENT

NO.124

OF

2004

JUDGMENT

NO.124

OF

2004

JUDGMENT

NO.124

OF

2004

IN

IN

IN

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUIT

SUIT

SUIT

NO.2927

OF

2003

NO.2927

OF

2003

NO.2927

OF

2003

Kishanlal M. Dagliya

...Plaintiff

v/s

Paleshkumar B. Dhakad @ Jain

...Defendant

Mr R. Dave i/b M/s N.N. Vaishnawa and Co. for

Plaintiff.

Mr S.J. Ghogare for Defendant in support.

CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J.

DATE : 2ND MARCH 2007.

-2-

P.C. :-

1.

From the record it appears that the reply was

filed

in

summons

for

judgment

on

26th

August

2005

and

the

Office

did

not

place

that

reply

before

the

Court,

with

the

result

the

Court

has

observed

in

the

order

that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top