SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DILIP RAMANLAL MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
MADHUKANT J. SHAH AND ARVIND PARMAR – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

jmi

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1010 OF 2009

IN

SUIT NO.3428 OF 2008.

Dilip Ramanlal Mehta.

..Plaintiff.

vs.

Madhukant J. Shah.

..Defendant.

WITH

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1902 OF 2009

IN

SUIT NO.3428 OF 2008.

Dilip Ramanlal Mehta.

..Plaintiff.

vs.

Madhukant J. Shah.

..Defendant.

And

Arvind Parmar.

..Applicant.

....

Mr. Tushar Goradia, a/w. Y.K. Tiwari, a/w. Anand Kumar Singh, for

Plaintiff.

Mr. Sanjay Sandhan, for Defendant.

Mr. Ram Apte, Senior Counsel, a/w. Ms. Anjali Helekar, i/b. Neel

Helekar, for Applicant in Notice of Motion No.1902/2009.

....

CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.

DATE : 18TH JUNE 2009.

P.C.

The suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for the

2

following reliefs :-

(a) It be declared that the partnership business

carried on under the name and style of M/s.

Siddhivinayak Enterprises between the plaintiff

and the defendant by virtue of patnership deed

dated 19

th August 2003 stands dissolved as and

from the date of the filing of this suit or from such

other date as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and

proper;

(b) That the said partnership betw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top