SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Digitally signed 1/3 11.NMS-1126-2017.doc by Gauri A.

Gaekwad Date:

2021.03.09

14:44:38 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1126 OF 2017 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.367 OF 2015 Reliance Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.

(Trustee of Reliance ARC 001 Trust) ….Applicant/Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s.

Navinchandra G. Hegde and Ors. ….Respondents ----

Mr. Nikhil Rajani i/b. V. Deshpande and Co. for applicant.

Mr. Anshul Anjarlekar i/b. M/s. Raval-Shah and Co. for respondent nos.2 to

4.

Mr. P.K. Nardele, OSD Court Receiver present.

Mr. Satish B. Gangurde, Section Officer, representative of court receiver present.

----

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATED : 8th MARCH 2021 P.C. :

1 At the outset, Mr. Anjarlekar states that Raval-Shah and Company have instructions to file Vakalatnama for respondent nos.2 and 4 as well, who are sons of respondent no.3.

Vakalatnama to be filed under advise to Court Receiver as well as Mr. Rajani’s instructing advocates within one week from today.

2 Respondent nos.1, 5 and 6 are not represented. Further to the order dated 22nd February 2021, Court Receiver has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top