1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION NO.2 OF 2009

IN

MISC.PETITION NO.41 OF 2001

IN

PROBATE PETITION NO.454 OF 1985

Ms.Nirupa Thacker

.. Petitioner

Versus

Mrs.Khorshed Kersasp Aga

.. Respondent

Mrs.Bhavna Shah for petitioner

Mr.Vishakha Vaswani i/b. V.V.Juris for respondent

Mr.Subodh Joshi i/b. Mahendra Swar for intervenors (today absent).

CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.

DATE : November 26, 2009.

P.C.:

1]

This review petition seeks review of my order dated 20^th February

2009. The review is sought by the original respondents and for the

reasons and grounds stated in the petition.

3]

However, as was observed in the main order, even during the

course of the review proceedings, parties met, discussed and negotiated

for an overall settlement. Since the dispute was long pending, they

2

sought further time which was granted.

4]

Ultimately, when the review petition was placed for admission, the

petitioner and respondents tendered consent terms.

5]

The review petitioner has specifically stated before me that if the

consent terms are taken on record, then, the review petition will not be

pressed.

6]

Today, p