HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
T. V. MADHUSUDHAN – Appellant
Versus
MAC LABORATORIES LTD – Respondent
CP 356/2004
ssm
sm
sm
IN
IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
ORDINARY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPNAY
COMPNAY
COMPNAY PETITION NO. 356 OF
PETITION NO. 356 OF
PETITION NO. 356 OF 2004
2004
2004
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s Orders
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. Yadu Bhargavan i/by M/s.
Ratna Bhargavan & Associates for
the petitioners.
No appearance for the
respondents.
CORAM
CORAM
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
: ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
: ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED
DATED
DATED : 12th July, 2007
: 12th July, 2007
: 12th July, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. The present petition is filed
for recovery of retirement dues
and outstanding claim of salary
and bonus totalling to
Rs.98,000/-( Rupees ninety eight
thousand only). The statutory
notice was issued on 15th
January, 2002. The notice was
duly served. There is no dispute
to the said liability. The
petitioner, therefore, again sent
a reminder which remained
un-replied. The petitioner,
( 2 )
thereafter, in the circumstances,
has filed the present petition on
2nd December, 2003.
2. None appeared for the
company, though served. On 10th
March, 2005, this Court has
admitted the petition.
3. The petitioner has complied
all the formalities. The
affidavit of service dated 16th
March, 2005 and the affidavit of
publication dated 28th December,
2005 are the part of the record.
None appeared for the respondent
company. There is no resistance
and or defence raised to the
petition. The averments made,
therefore, remained
uncontroverted.
3. Therefore, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, as the
claim is within limitation, the
( 3 )
present petition is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a) and
(b).
4. The concerned parties to take
appropriate steps in accordance
with law.
[ANOOP
[ANOOP
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
V. MOHTA, J.]
V. MOHTA, J.]