SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - ORIGINAL SIDE,BOMBAY
NIRUPAMA JITENDRA MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


906-OSWP-3313-2021-MODIFIED.DOC

Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 3313 OF 2021

Nirupama Jitendra Mehta

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra

…Respondent

Ms Tulsi Shah, i/b Akash P Shah, for the Petitioner.

Mrs Jyoti Chavan, AGP, for Respondent No. 1-State.

CORAM

G.S. Patel &

Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ.

DATED:

17th December 2021

PC:-

1.

The Petition seeks an appointment of the Petitioner

(“Nirupama”) as the legal guardian of her husband, Jitendra

Mansukhlal Mehta (“Jitendra”). He is said to be in a vegetative

state since 21st February 2017. He took suddenly unwell that

afternoon. He was unable to move. An immediate consultation with

the family physician required that Jitendra be moved to a hospital.

On 23rd February 2017 he was admitted to the casualty ward of the

Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital at Andheri. He was then

shifted to the ICU. He was unresponsive and nearly comatose. His

condition was said to be critical and he slipped into a deep coma.

Page 1 of 13

17th December 2021

ARUN

RAMCHNDRA

SANKPAL

Digitally signed by

ARUN

RAMCHNDRA

SANKPAL

Date: 2022.01.12

12:02:24 +0530

906-OSWP-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top