SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE TRUSTEES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GOLDBRICKS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED AND 4 ORS – Respondent


11-CARAP411-19.DOC

Ashwini

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

COMM ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2019

Urban Infrastructure Trustees Ltd

...Applicant

Versus

Goldbricks Infrastructure Private Limited And

Ors

...Respondents

Mr Smiti Tewari, i/b Khaitan Legal

Associates for the Petitioner.

Mr Shyam Dewani, with Mr Chirag Chanani, i/b Dewani

Associates

for the Respondent.

CORAM:

G.S. PATEL, J.

DATED:

25th November 2019

PC:-

1.

Parties agree that an order of appointment of arbitrator even if

made today will not take efect for a period of 30 days, during which

time the parties will attempt to resolve their disputes by negotiation.

If there is no compromise arrived on or before 31st December 2019,

then the parties will refer their disputes to the sole arbitration of a

person nominated by this Court.

2.

The suggestion is reasonable. The parties leave the choice of

arbitrator to the Court.

Page 1 of 9

25th November 2019

11-CARAP411-19.DOC

3.

There are two agreements in question. One is a shareholders’

agreement or SHA dated 12th May 2008. The other is a share

subscription agreement or SSA dated 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top