NARMADA BIKANRAO SHINDE AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
ARUN BIKANRAO SHINDE AND ANOTHER – Respondent
*1*
9wp1526o17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1526 OF 2017
NARMADA BIKANRAO SHINDE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
ARUN BIKANRAO SHINDE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Surve Hemant.
Advocate for Respondent 2 : Shri Adwant S.V..
...
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 30th July, 2018
Per Court:
1
I have heard the learned Advocates for the Petitioner and
Respondent No.2. Respondent No.1, though served, has not caused an
appearance either in person or through an Advocate.
2
The Petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned order dated
30.06.2016 passed by the Trial Court by which, an injunction in RCS
No.439/2016 was refused. The Petitioners are also aggrieved by the order
dated 25.10.2016 passed by the Appellate Court by which, Miscellaneous
Civil Appeal No.107/2016 filed by the Petitioners, was rejected.
3
Considering the order that I intend to pass in the light of the
statements of the learned Advocates made on instructions, I am not
required to advert to their entire submissions. Suffice it to say that the
*2*
9wp1526o17
civil suit filed by the Petitioners would not be maintainable in view of the
law la
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.