SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NARMADA BIKANRAO SHINDE AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
ARUN BIKANRAO SHINDE AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['SURVE HEMANT AND KSHITIJ SURVE', 'R/ SERVED', '', 'ADWANT S V', 'R/ SERVED', 'KAMRAN KHAN']

*1*

9wp1526o17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 1526 OF 2017

NARMADA BIKANRAO SHINDE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

ARUN BIKANRAO SHINDE AND ANOTHER

...

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Surve Hemant.

Advocate for Respondent 2 : Shri Adwant S.V..

...

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE :- 30th July, 2018

Per Court:

1

I have heard the learned Advocates for the Petitioner and

Respondent No.2. Respondent No.1, though served, has not caused an

appearance either in person or through an Advocate.

2

The Petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned order dated

30.06.2016 passed by the Trial Court by which, an injunction in RCS

No.439/2016 was refused. The Petitioners are also aggrieved by the order

dated 25.10.2016 passed by the Appellate Court by which, Miscellaneous

Civil Appeal No.107/2016 filed by the Petitioners, was rejected.

3

Considering the order that I intend to pass in the light of the

statements of the learned Advocates made on instructions, I am not

required to advert to their entire submissions. Suffice it to say that the

*2*

9wp1526o17

civil suit filed by the Petitioners would not be maintainable in view of the

law la

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top