SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BALASAHEB S/O RAMRAO BADE AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['THOMBRE S S', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'PP', 'ADV C V THOMBRE', 'PP']

CrAppln 04 19 J.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 04 OF 2019

1)

Balasaheb s/o Ramrao Bade,

Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture,

R/o. Gavandhara, Tq. Kille Dharur,

District Beed.

2)

Madan s/o Govind More, Age 52

years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Kari,

Tq. Kille Dharur, Dist. Beed.

3)

Anita w/o Madan More, Age 50

years, Occ. Agriculture,

R/o. as above.

...

Applicants.

VERSUS.

1)

The State of Maharashtra,

Through Police Inspector,

Police Station, Dharur,

Tq. Dharur, Dist. Beed.

2)

Shivaji Bapurao Ghule,

Age 49 years, Occ. Service,

As Assistant Registrar,

Co-Operative Societies Dharur,

Tq. Dharur, Dist. Beed.

...

Respondents.

...

Mr. Thombre S.S., Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. Borade P.G., A.P.P. for respondent No. 1.

Mr. C.V. Thombre, Advocate for Assist to P.P.

CORAM

: T.V. NALAWADE &

MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

Date of reserving the Judgment

: 19.03.2019

Date of pronouncing the Judgment : 09.04.2019

JUDGMENT (PER MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) :

Heard.

2.

Rule. The rule is made returnable forthwith. The learned APP

waives

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top