SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
GRAMIN CHAL CHITRAPAT PRADARSHAK SANGH.PRESIDENT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAH. and OTHERS – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.4485 of 1994

1] The Gram Chal-Chitrapat

Pradarshak Sangh, Jalgaon

through its President -

Shri Chintaman Raoji Choudhary,

Age 66 years, Occ. Business,

R/o. Bhole colony, Bhusawal,

Taluka bhusawal, District Jalgaon.

2] Sudhakar Venkat Mahajan

Age 54 years, Occ. Business,

R/o. Ruzoda, Tal. Raver,

District Jalgaon.

Petitioners

Versus

1] The State of Maharashtra

2] The Tahsildar, Raver,

Taluka Raver, District Jalgaon.

3] The Collector, Jalgaon,

District Jalgaon.

Respondents

Mr. R.N. Dhorde,, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. For respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ.

DATE : 14TH JUNE, 2010.

ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER B.R. GAVAI,J] :-

2

1]

By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the

validity of the amendment to the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act,

1923, ( hereinafter referred to as, “ the said Act”) firstly by way of

amendment in 1993 to Section 2 of the said Act thereby adding a

proviso after first proviso of Section 2 and secondly, the amendment

in the year 1994, by which the second proviso to Section 2 has been

amended and a third p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top