SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RATNAMAL W/O ATMARAM SHIRAMWAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Criminal Appeal No.847/2014

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.847 OF 2014

Ratnamala Atmaram Shiramwad

...

APPELLANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others

...

RESPONDENTS

.....

Shri R.K. Ashtekar, Advocate for appellant

Mrs. R.K. Laddha, A.P.P. for respondent No.1/ State

.....

CORAM:

A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED:

29th January, 2015.

ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for appellant - complainant.

Perused record. Learned counsel for the appellant is submitting

that the trial Court has wrongly acquitted the accused persons.

The daughter of the complainant (referred in this order as "X")

was minor when she was kidnapped by the accused persons.

The document Exhibit 48 Viddyarthi Pravesh Nirgam Pramane

Criminal Appeal No.847/2014

2

Nondani was discarded by the trial Court, and relying on other

evidence, the trial Court held that the fact that the girl was

minor, was not established. According to learned counsel, the

acquittal needs to be interfered with and the appeal should be

admitted.

2.

Going through the material available and the

reasonings recorded by the trial Court it is appearing that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top