BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RATNAMAL W/O ATMARAM SHIRAMWAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.847/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.847 OF 2014
Ratnamala Atmaram Shiramwad
...
APPELLANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
...
RESPONDENTS
.....
Shri R.K. Ashtekar, Advocate for appellant
Mrs. R.K. Laddha, A.P.P. for respondent No.1/ State
.....
CORAM:
A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
DATED:
29th January, 2015.
ORAL ORDER :
1.
Heard learned counsel for appellant - complainant.
Perused record. Learned counsel for the appellant is submitting
that the trial Court has wrongly acquitted the accused persons.
The daughter of the complainant (referred in this order as "X")
was minor when she was kidnapped by the accused persons.
The document Exhibit 48 Viddyarthi Pravesh Nirgam Pramane
Criminal Appeal No.847/2014
2
Nondani was discarded by the trial Court, and relying on other
evidence, the trial Court held that the fact that the girl was
minor, was not established. According to learned counsel, the
acquittal needs to be interfered with and the appeal should be
admitted.
2.
Going through the material available and the
reasonings recorded by the trial Court it is appearing that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.