SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAYYED IQBAL SAYYED SAFDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['GHATGE MAHESH V', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'GP']

26-WP-230-19

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.230 OF 2019

Sayyed Iqbal S/o Sayyed Safdar

Age: 57 years, Occu.: Business

R/o. Chirag Ali Mohalla, Nandurbar

Dist. Nandurbar.

… Petitioner

VERSUS

1. The State of Maharashtra

Through its Principal Secretary

Revenue and Forest Department

Mantralaya Mumbai - 32.

2.

The District Collector,

Collector Office, Nandurbar

3.

The Deputy Collector,

Sub Divisional Office, Nandurbar

4.

The Tahsildar,

Tahsil Office, Nandurbar

5.

The Talathi,

Tahsil Office, Nandurbar.

6.

The Circle Inspecotr,

Tahsil Office, Nandurbar.

… Respondents.

....

Mr. M.V. Ghatge, Advocate for Petitioner;

Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

....

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE

AND

S.M. GAVHANE, JJ

DATED : 04th MARCH, 2019

26-WP-230-19

2

PER COURT:-

1.

Heard Mr. Ghatge, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

Mr. Ghatge, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted

that the notice was issued on 05.12.2018. The reply is also filed

Shri Mahendra Uttam Kadambande on behalf of Respondent No.4

Considering the contentions raised in the petition as well as

considering the documents

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top