Narayan s/o Tatayarao Deshmukh vs The State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. Shinde, J
Narayan s/o Tatayarao Deshmukh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. V.D. Salunke
For the Respondents: Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P.

Table of Content
1. challenge to orders passed regarding land holdings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion on the timelines and jurisdiction for land inquiries. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. arguments regarding jurisdictional authority and timelines. (Para 6 , 9 , 11)
4. final judgment quashes previous land surplus orders based on jurisdiction. (Para 14 , 20)

ORAL JUDGMENT :

. This writ petition takes exception to the judgment and order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad dated 26th February, 1988 in Case No. 1979-ICH- R-254, judgment and order passed by the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Jalna dated 13th March, 1990 in Case No. 88/L.R./ICH/CR-5 and further to the judgment and order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad dated 30th January, 1991 in Case No. 85/A/90/Jalna.

2. The petitioners herein are the resident of village Ambhoda (Deshmukh) Taluka Partur District Jalna. It appears that, during the pendency of this writ petition, original petitioner Narayanrao died and therefore, his legal heirs are brought on record and they are prosecuting this petition.

. The original landlord Narayan filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABADS.S. Shinde, JNarayan s/o Tatayarao Deshmukh – AppellantVersusThe State of Maharashtra – Respondent

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. Shinde, J
Narayan s/o Tatayarao Deshmukh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent