BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SUBHASH S/O SHANKAR PAWARA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP 6/2015
criwp6-15.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION 6 OF 2015
1]
Subhash S/o Shankar Pawara
Age 31 years, Occ.Gram Sevak,
R/o Dhanaje (Bk.) Tq.Dhadgaon
Dist.Nandurbar.
2]
Ajay S/o Shankar Pawara
Age 21 years, Occ.Shop keeper,
R/o Dhanaje (Bk.) Tq.Dhadgaon
Dist.Nandurbar.
3]
Anil S/o Kuta Pawara
Age 24 years, Occ.Student
R/o Dhanaje (Bk.)Tq.Dhadgaon
Dist.Nandurbar.
.. PETITIONERS
Versus
1]
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Principal Secretary,
Home Department,
State of Maharashtra
Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032.
2]
The Director General of Police
Maharashtra State
Police Head Quarter,
Fort, Mumbai.
3]
The Deputy Inspector General of Police
Nashik Range, Nashik.
4]
The Superintendent of Police,
Nandurbar, Dist.Nandurbar
5]
Mr.M.Ramkumar
Age 34 years, Occu-
criwp6-15.odt
2
Superintendent of Police
Nandurbar, Dist.Nandurbar
6]
Mr.Shivaji Gavit,
Age 45 years, Occu-
Sub Divisional Police Officer
Shahada Division, Dist.
Nandurbar.
7]
Mr.Chandrakant S/o Popat Gangurde
Age 45 years, Occu-Police Inspector,
Pawarwadi Police Station, Malegaon
Tq.Malegaon, Dist.Nashik
8]
Mr.Nana Daulat Bagul
Age 48 years, Occ-Asst.Police
Sub Inspector, Police Head
Quarter, Office of Superintendent
of Police, Nandurbar, Tq. &
Dist.Nandurbar.
.. RESPONDENTS
[Respondent no.1 to 4 to be served
through Assistant Government Pleader,
High Court of Judicature of Bombay
Bench at Aurangabad]
-----
Mr.Pradip R. Patil Advocate for petitioners
Mr.V.M.Kagne APP for Respondents 1 to 4
Mr.R.R.Mantri, Advocate for respondents 7 & 8.
-----
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE &
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
RESERVED ON : 13/11/ 2017.
PRONOUNCED ON :29/11/2017.
JUDGMENT ( PER MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) :
1]
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally
with the consent of all the parties.
criwp6-15.odt
3
2]
This is a Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
alleged violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioners guaranteed by
Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India with following prayers :
“A]
By a writ of mandamus, orders or
directions in the nature of mandamus,
petitioners
be
granted
appropriate
compensation for their illegal detention on
30.10.2014 and illegal arrest on 03.11.2014
and 11.11.2014 contrary to the directions of
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh
Kumar and DK Basu's case.
B]
By a writ of mandamus, orders or
directions in the nature of mandamus,
respondents be directed to register criminal
case against the respondent no.7
Mr.Gangurde, Police Inspector Dhadgaon
Police Station, Dist. Nandurbar under
Prevention of Corruption Act and it be
investigated by an independent officer.
C]
By a writ of Mandamas the respondents
be directed to hold a departmental inquiry in to
the misuse of powers and illegalities
committed by Respondent no.7 Mr.Gangurde.
D]
By a writ of mandamus, orders or
directions in the nature of mandamus,
respondents be directed to hold a fresh
enquiry in Crime Register No.56/2014
registered with Dhadgaon Police Station
(Exhibit “F” page 27) by an independent
police officer and report be submitted before
this Hon'ble High Court.”
2]
Shorn of details, the petitioners' averments are to the effect that they
are residents of village Dhanaje (Bk) Tq. Dhadgaon, Dist.Nandurbar. The
petitioners 1 and 2 are full brothers and the petitioner no.3 is their paternal
cousin. Respondents 2 and 3 are the Director General and Deputy
Inspector General of Police of Maharashtra and Nasik Range respectively.
Respondent no.4 is the Superintendent of Police by designation.
Respondent no.5 was the Superintendent of Police holding the post at
criwp6-15.odt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.