SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
AMIR GULAB SAYYED – Appellant
Versus
NATHA MAHADU JADHAV and ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJENDRA K TEMKAR', 'P K JOSHI', '', 'A R SALVE', 'R/ DISMISSED', 'MUKESH K GOYANKA']

1

749.04FA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

FIRST APPEAL NO. 749 OF 2004

Amir Gulab Sayyed

Age : 31 years, Occ : Nil,

R/o Walki, Tq. Ahmednagar,

Dist. Ahmednagar.

.

..APPELLANT

(Original Claimant)

VERSUS

1.

Natha Mahadu Jadhav

Age : 44 years, Occ : Driver,

R/o Tarakpur Depot,

S.T. Stand, Nagar Depot.

(Appeal dismissed against

Respondent No.1 vide Registrar’s

order dated 10.10.2006)

2.

The Maharashtra State Road

Transport Corporation,

(Summons to be served on the

Depot Manager, M.S.R.T.C.

Ahmednagar).

.

..RESPONDENTS

( Original respondents)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.K. Temkar

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Manoj Shinde h/f Mr.

M.K. Goyanka

...

CORAM : S.G.DIGE, J.

RESERVED ON : 27.09.2022

PRONOUNCED ON : 19.10.2022

JUDGMENT :

By this appeal, the appellant is seeking

2

749.04FA

enhancement of compensation.

2.

Brief facts of the case are as under :-

On 5th September, 1996 at about 8 a.m. the

appellant (for short, “the claimant”) along with brother-in-

law were coming on the bicycle from Kedgaon to

Ahmednagar. When they reached near Kinetic Chowk, one

S.T. Bus bearing No.MH-12-2609 came from oppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top