SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APRUKABAI KRISHNANATH PAWAR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI A B KALEand B G KALE', '', 'G B RAJALE', 'KAKADE N K', 'G P', '', 'A S BAJAJ', 'A S BAJAJ', 'R/ O SERVED R NO AND DISMISSED']

1 wp 3545.96

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 3545 OF 1996

1.

Smt. Aprukabai Krishnanath Pawar

and others

.. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others

.. Respondents

Shri N. K. Kakade, Advocate for Petitioners.

Smt. R. K. Ladda, A.G.P. for Respondent/State.

Shri A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6-A and 6-B.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 14TH MARCH, 2012.

PER COURT :

.

The present writ petition is filed against the order of

Additional Collector, Ahmednagar thereby allowing the appeal

filed by respondents and setting aside the order of the Sub

Divisional Officer, Ahmednagar remanding the matter to the

Tahsildar for decision of an appeal filed by present petitioners to

the S. D. O. regarding fixation of purchase price.

2.

Shri Kakade, the learned counsel for petitioners submits

2 wp 3545.96

that the Sub Divisional Officer after considering all the facets of

the matter had correctly remanded the proceedings to the

Tahsildar. There is no order passed in Tenanc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top