ORAL JUDGMENT :

1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 9th August, 1996, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner, by which the Court has declined to refund the Court fees to the petitioner-lady keeping in view the Government Resolution dated 01.10.1994.

2 I have considered the strenuous submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. It is contended that the son of the petitioner - deceased Sameer met with an accident on 14.11.1995 and passed away. He had drawn an insurance policy with the Life Insurance Corporation of India. He had certain provident fund accumulations as well. The learned Advocate for the petitioner is unable to state as to the employment details of deceased-Sameer. The name of the petitioner was not mentioned as a nominee insofar as the Provident Fund and Group Insurance Scheme is concerned. The petitioner deposited Rs.4225/- towards court fees for seeking the succession certificate with reference to the maturity amount of insurance policy, which is Rs.One lac.

3 The petitioner moved an application before the trial Court seeking refund of the said amount on the basis of the G.R. Dated 01.10.1994. The trial Court considered t