SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GAURI ANIL PAMPATWAR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
HAMID MEHANDIBHAI NATHANI AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['DESHMUKH SACHIN S', 'GIRISH RANE', '', 'S G CHAPALGAONKAR']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1258 OF 2013 IN

FIRST APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2012

Gauri W/o.Anil Pampatwar and others

APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Hamid Mehandibhai Nathani

and another

RESPONDENTS

Mr.Sachin S.Deshmukh, Advocate for applicants.

(CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND

R.V.GHUGE, J.J. )

DATE : 05/07/2013

PER COURT :

1.

The grievance of the applicant is that the Registry of the High

Court has refused to accept 7 solvency certificates, each for an

amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. The reason for refusing to accept the

solvency certificates is that the market value of the property, which is

mentioned in all the certificates is Rs.19,96,500/-, whereas the

solvency certificates have been issued by Tahsildar for an amount of

Rs.2,00,000/-. It appears that Tahsildar has issued all 7 certificates

mentioning the same property in all the certificates for a value of Rs.

2,00,000/- each.

2

2.

The Office has pointed out the decision of the State

Government dated 22/06/2009, whereby the Tahsildar has been

entrusted with powers to issue solvency certificates from Rs.

2,00,00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top