SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAJIDODDIN SARFODDIN BADGUJAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NANDED AND OTHERS – Respondent


1

1231.22WP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

58 WRIT PETITION NO.1231 OF 2022

SAJIDODDIN SARFODDIN BADGUJAR

VERSUS

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NANDED & OTHERS

...

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.A.V.Patil Indrale

AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.P.Tiwari

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &

S.G.DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 24.01.2022

P.C. :

1]

The application filed by the petitioner for

revocation of the permission granted in favour of the

present respondents is rejected. The petitioner had resorted

to the remedy under Section 51 of the Maharashtra

Regional and Town Planning Act.

2]

We have heard Mr.A.V.Patil, learned counsel for

the petitioner.

3]

It appears that Civil Suit i.e. Regular Civil Suit

No.38/2015 is pending between the petitioner and some

persons, who are claiming to be the owners of part of the

property over which construction is being made allegedly by

respondent nos.5 to 7.

2

1231.22WP

4]

It is not disputed by the petitioner that property

on which the construction is being made and the petitioner

claims to be the owner, is subject matter of Regular Civil

Suit No.35 of 2018. The present respondent nos.5 to 7 are

not party to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top