SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NARAYAN SITARAM LANDGE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['GAIKWAD T G', 'SHELKE SHIVAJI T', '', 'COPY SERVED ON ADV S T SHELKE']

{1}

wp 1474.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.1474 OF 2017

Narayan S/o Sitaram Landge

Petitioner

Versus

The State Election Commission

for State of Maharashtra

through Secretary and others

Respondents

Mr.T.G. Gaikwad advocate for the petitioner

Mr. A.S.Shinde, AGP for Respondent No.2 & 3

Mr. S.T. Shelke advocate for respondent No.1.

_______________

CORAM : V.M. KANADE &

SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ

(Date : 1st February, 2017.)

PER COURT :-

1

Heard learned advocate appearing for the petitioner.

2

The grievance of the petitioner is that, names of 34 persons

have been wrongly included in the final voters list. It is submitted

that, all these persons are neither residents of the village nor they

carry on any occupation. It is submitted that, they have not

submitted relevant documents. The petitioner, therefore, filed

objection with the Tahsildar. The Tahsildar made an enquir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top