SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNANDA SUNDAR SURYAWANSHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['JADHAVAR SANTOSH S', 'COPY SERVED ON G P', '', 'NO CAVEAT', 'GP', 'CHAVAN P S', 'R/ SERVED']

1 wp 5861.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 5861 OF 2018

Sunanda Sundar Suryawanshi

.. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others

.. Respondents

Shri Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Shri P. S. Chavan, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

Shri V. V. Kabade, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND

A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2019.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the

petitioner is rejected.

2.

The petitioner herein is appointed on 16.07.2008. The

services of the petitioner were terminated probably on the

ground that approval to the appointment was not granted. The

petitioner filed an appeal before the School Tribunal. The School

Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner and set aside

order of termination dated 02.01.2013 and directed

reinstatement of the petitioner, so also directed payment of

2 wp 5861.18

salary as against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top