HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HARIBHAU P CHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
APPLN 836/2014
1 836-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 836 OF 2014
Haribhau Pandurang Chavan
...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...
Respondent
Mr. R. J. Nirmal for the applicant
Mr. B. L. Dhus, APP for the respondent-State
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.
DATE
: 24th February, 2014
PER COURT :
1.
The application is filed for bail. Both the sides are heard. This
Court has perused papers of investigation.
2.
The crime is registered on the basis of report given by father of the
deceased. Deceased was aged about 19 years. One girl aged about 17 years
is a daughter sister of the complainant. Another daughter of the complainant
was given in marriage to Subhash, son of the said sister.
3.
The allegations are made that few days prior to the date of incident
the deceased Vishu went to the house of the said sister of the complainant
and he brought daughter of the said sister of the complainant to his house.
The said sister of the complainant, her son Subhash and her son-in-law Vilas
1/3
2 836-14
become angry due to this conduct of the Vishnu. Vishnu had virtually
kidnapped the said girl and the said girl had started living in the house of
the complainant. The allegations are made that on 25.10.2013, Vilas, one of
the accused visited the house of the complainant and he requested the
complainant to send Vishnu with him. The complainant had given word of
caution to Visnhu as he had suspicion that Vishnu will be finished by his
sister, Subhash and Vilas. Inspite of that caution, Vishnu went with the
Vilas when the complainant was not at home. On the next morning, the
complainant received phone call of Vishnu and Vishnu informed that he
was being taken forcibly away by Subhash, Vilas and present applicant.
The present applicant is brother in law of the said sister of the complainant.
After that, nothing was heard about Vishnu. Dead body of Vishu was
found on 28.12.2013. One letter written by the said daughter of the sister of
the complainant was found with the deceased show that she had love affair
with the deceased.
4.
Papers of investigation that Vishnu died due to head injury.
Papers of investigation include statements of some witnesses showing that
they had seen Vishnu, Subhash in the company of Vishnu at the relevant
time. Statements of Vilas and Subhash are recorded under section 27 of the
Evidence Act.
2/3
3 836-14
5.
From the record it can be said that there is allegation against the
applicant that Vishnu had informed that he was being taken away forcibly
by Subhash, Vilas and the present applicant in a Jeep. It appears that
investigating agency has not collected the call details record in respect of
mobile phone of Vishnu or mobile phone of the complainant.
6.
The applicant has been behind bars since 30.10.2013. In view of
the nature of material available against the applicant, this Court holds that
it is not desirable to keep the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case
against him. In the result, the application is allowed.
7.
The applicant is to be released on bail on his furnishing PR and SB
of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with one solvent surety in the
like amount. He is not to commit similar offence. He is not to tamper with
the prosecution witnesses. He is not to enter the village of the complainant
till disposal of the case.
( T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
JPC
3/3