SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BAJIRAO BHAVSING CHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['PATIL PARESH B', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'G P', 'R/ SERVED', 'DESHMUKH ANIKET V']

1 wp 997.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 997 OF 2013

Bajirao Bhavsing Chavan

.. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another

.. Respondent

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 1012 OF 2013

Bajirao Bhavsing Chavan

.. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another

.. Respondent

Shri Paresh B. Patil Advocate for the Petitioner in both petitions.

Shri V. B. Ghatage, A.G.P. for Respondent/State in both petitions.

Shri A. V. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 in both

petitions.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 20TH FEBRUARY, 2013.

PER COURT :

.

The grievance made by the petitioner in both these

petitions is that in spite of filing of caveat the Additional

2 wp 997.13

Commissioner has granted stay without hearing the petitioner.

2.

Shri P. B. Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that, after the order was passed by the Additional

Collector, the petitioner immediately filed a caveat with the

Additional Commissioner. That caveat was filed an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top