HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SHANTARAM ASHOK DEVTARSE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
ABA 109/2021
ABA109-21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 109 OF 2021
Shantaram s/o Ashok Devtarse
Age 34 years, Occu: Business & Agri.
R/o Kanher Vasti, Sonai, Tq. Newasa,
District Ahmednagar
...
Applicant
VERSUS
1.
The State of Maharashtra,
Throgh Police Inspector
Sonai Police Station, Sonai,
District Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar
...
Respondents
2.
The Superintendent of Police,
Ahmednagar, District Ahmednagar
Mr. S. J. Salunke h/for Mr. M. S. Taur, Advocate for the applicant,
Mrs V. S. Chaudhari, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM
: V. G. BISHT, J.
RESERVED ON
: 17th August, 2021.
PRONOUNCED ON
: 24th August, 2021.
ORDER:
1.
This is an application under section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 preferred by the applicant seeking grant of
pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No. 16/2021 registered with
Sonai Police Station, District Ahmednagar for the offences punishable
under Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and
under section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of
Depositors(in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.
Page 1 of 5
ABA109-21
2.
It is the case of the prosecution that at the instance and
persuasion of the present applicant, the informant, his family members,
relatives and friends in all invested Rs.6,81,28,983/- with Ujwal Agro
Multistate Cooperative Society, Mauli Multistate Credit Cooperative
Society and other societies during the period from 2017 to 2019. The
present applicant and other accused had promised the informant and
other investors that they will get the amount twice in a year and also
other financial benefits. However, the amount was not repaid and rather
they found themselves to be cheated.
3.
Mr. S. J. Salunke, learned counsel for the applicant, submits
that the present applicant is neither a Director nor member or in any
capacity working on behalf of Ujwal Agro Multistate Cooperative Society
or any other societies as alleged in the first information report.
According to the learned counsel, the applicant himself has deposited
total amount to the tune of Rs.35,70,000/- in Ujwal Agro Multistate
Cooperative Society, Mauli Multistate Credit Cooperative Society under
various schemes in the name of his brother, father, his wife, and in his
own name relying on the sweet words of the Chairman and Directors
of the said Societies. The learned counsel also submits that the
applicant was also promised by the Chairman and Directors of the said
Societies that he would get double amount after the prescribed period.
Out of Rs.35,70,000/- an amount of Rs. 22,08,122/- is still remained
to be recovered from those Societies. The applicant himself is a victim
who has lost the said amount. The learned counsel then invited my
Page 2 of 5
ABA109-21
attention to various deposits made by the applicant and his family
members and would submit that this is a fit case where the applicant
should be given benefit of pre-arrest bail.
4.
Mrs V. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P., on the other hand, would
submit that the present applicant was working as an Agent of the
societies in question and was handsomely rewarded by way of
commission. It was the applicant who induced the informant and other
investors and showed a rosy picture and thus not only he alongwith
others committed criminal breach of trust but also cheated on the
various investors. The learned counsel then invited my attention to
the statements of witnesses and also the statement prepared of
showing commissions received by the applicant. According to the
learned A.P.P., th