SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI HARISH DANGRE
NAGNATH RAMCHANDRA MUTTEWAR – Appellant
Versus
SADHANA NAGNATH MUTTEPWAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


1 977WP2600.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 2600 OF 2021

Nagnath s/o Ramchandra Muttepwar

...Petitioner

Versus

Sadhana Nagnath Muttepwar & Ors. ...Respondents

.....

Mr. A. D. Kasliwal, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. D. K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondents

.....

CORAM : BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.

DATE : JANUARY 6TH, 2022

PER COURT : -

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

Counsel for the respondents.

2.

The petitioner, who is the original plaintiff, instituted Reg.

Civil Suit No. 671/2014, where he sought a declaration and

injunction. The suit being instituted in the year 2014, though the

respondents/defendants filed their appearance on being served they

failed to file their written statement, resultantly an order of ‘no WS’

came to be passed. This order was however set aside, on the request

made by the defendants subject to the costs. However, there was no

compliance and again an application was moved to file written

SG Punde, PA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top