Advocates:
['BIRADAR R D', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV S S PANALE']

Cri. Appeal No.484/2015 with

Cri.Appln.No.793/2015

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.484 OF 2015

Dattatraya s/o Govindrao Puri

...

APPELLANT

VERSUS

Sunil s/o Fulchand Garad & ors.

...

RESPONDENTS

.....

Shri R.D. Biradar, Advocate for appellant

Shri S.S. Panale, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5

Shri A.M. Phule, A.P.P. for respondent/ State

.....

WITH

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.793 OF 2015

Dattatraya s/o Govindrao Puri

...

APPELLANT

VERSUS

Sunil s/o Fulchand Garad & ors.

...

RESPONDENTS

.....

Shri R.D. Biradar, Advocate for appellant

Shri S.S. Panale, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5

Shri A.M. Phule, A.P.P. for respondent/ State

.....

CORAM:

A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED:

6th April, 2016.

ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard counsel for the appellant.

Cri. Appeal No.484/2015 with

Cri.Appln.No.793/2015

2

2.

Question is :-

"When sanction to prosecute is required under

Maharashtra Regional Town Planning, 1966 Act

and the State case filed by the Corporation

after filing F.I.R. has resulted in acquittal, can

private individual prefer appeal claiming to be

victim ?

3.

Counsel for appellant submits that, the respondent

Nos.1 to 5 (o