SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADHAV VENATRAO PATIL – Appellant
Versus
JANARDHAN VENKATAO PATIL AND ORS – Respondent


wp2351.09.doc

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 2351 OF 2009

Madhav s/o Venatrao Patil

age 63 years, occ. Agriculture

r/o Wanwada, Tq. Ausa

Dist. Latur.

.. PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

Janardhan s/o Venkatrao Patil

age 58 years, occ. Agriculture

r/o Wanwada, Tq. Ausa

dist. Latur.

2.

Trambak s/o Venkatrao Patil

age 48 years, occ. Agril.

r/o Rajewadi, Tq. Ausa

Dist. Latur.

3.

Keshavrao s/o Venkatrao Patil

age 61 years, occ. Agril.

r/o Wanwada, Tq. Ausa

Dist. Latur.

4.

Sandipan s/o Venkatrao Patil

age 54 years, occ. Agril,

r/o Rajewadi, Tq. Ausa

Dist. Latur

.. RESPONDENTS

Mr. B.R. Surwase, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. M.L. Dharashive, advocate for respondents.

=====

CORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Heard.

2.

The question involved in this writ petition is as to whether any

amendment under the garb of clerical or typographical error could be made

wp2351.09.doc

2

to the compromise reached between the parties, which forms a basis of

decree passed by the Civil Court and confirmed by the High Court as well as

the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top