Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA, J
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
JANKIRAM SITARAM CHAUDHARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consent and presence of parties established for resolution. (Para 2) |
| 2. government resolution supports settlement of appeals. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court modifies interest based on established judgments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. directions for disbursement of compensation confirmed. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final disposal of appeals and civil applications. (Para 11 , 12) |
2. Mr. A. M. Phule / Mr. S. S. Dande, learned AGP for the appellant – State is present. Mr. Rajendra Wagh, Special Land Acquisition Officer No.1, Jalgaon and Mr. K. A. Sawant Patil, Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jalgaon are present on behalf of the Acquiring Body / State. The respondents – claimants are represented by their respective Advocates.
3. The learned Advocates for the Acquiring Body/State and the claimants fairly conceded that the Government of Maharashtra, vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/ pra.kra.4/Bham-1/A-4, dated 3rd November, 2016 with Government Corrigendums dated 23rd February, 2017 and 13th August, 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took decision to settle the appeals by accepting the market rates determined by the Reference Court, which are within the parameters set out in the Governmen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
