BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SHRI JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA, J
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
BAPURAO BALWANTRAO MOHITE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's authority confirmed under lok adalat. (Para 2) |
| 2. interest calculations guided by precedents. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. disbursement directed for claimants. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. appeals officially withdrawn. (Para 8 , 9) |
2. Mr. A. M. Phule / Mr. S. S. Dande, learned AGP for the appellant / State submitted that the Government of Maharashtra, vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/ pra.kra.4/Bham- 1/A-4, dated 3rd November, 2016 with Government Corrigendums dated 23rd February, 2017 and 13th August, 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took decision to settle the appeals by accepting the market rates determined by the Reference Court, which are within parameters set out in the Government Resolution. The statement made by the learned AGP is in consonance with the recitals in the Government Resolution. In turn, these appeals are fit to dispose of before the Lok Adalat.
3. The learned Advocate for appellant further submits that as far as the interest U/s. 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act , 1894 (for short “Act”) awarded by the SLAO as well as Reference Court shall be as per verdict by the Full Bench in the case of State of Maharashtra vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari ,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.