HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RAMANKUMAR DARSHANKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
BA 295/2022
- 1 -
ba295.22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 295 OF 2022
Ramankumar Darshankumar
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Mr. N. L. Chaudhari, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for respondent/State.
CORAM : M.G. Sewlikar, J.
DATE : 1st APRIL, 2022.
PER COURT :
1.
This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure for releasing the applicant on bail in connection
with Crime No. 0111/2020 registered with Dhule City Police Station,
District Dhule, for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420,
465, 466, 467, 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code
and under Sections 43, 66, 66(C), 66(D) of the Information
Technology Act.
2.
Informant is the Branch Manager in Axis Bank, Dhule
Branch. Axis Bank, Branch at Dhule, provided ‘PAYPRO’ facility to
- 2 -
ba295.22.odt
Dhule Viaks Sahakari Bank through online portal for RTGS and
NEFT transaction on Current Account bearing No. 914020008206406
maintained with Axis Bank, Dhule Branch. This facility has been in
operation since 1st August, 2019.
3.
It is alleged in the First Information Report that an
amount of Rs. 2,06,50,165/- was debited through the account of
Dhule Vikas Sahakari Bank despite not entering into any
transaction. Upon receipt of this message, the informant conducted
internal enquiry and found that on 8th June, 2020, between 7.00 am
and 10.15 am, one NEFT transaction and twenty six RTGS
transactions were conducted from the said bank account transferring
amount to the tune of Rs. 2,06,50,165/- to various bank accounts.
This information was immediately forwarded to the RTGS Hub of
Central Control Unit of Axis Bank to freeze the account. It is the
prosecution case that, in the enquiry, it was also revealed that some
unknown persons had hacked the system of Axis Bank and
committed theft of data, owing to which, amount from the said bank
account was transferred. On these allegations, First Information
Report came to be lodged with Dhule City Police Station on the basis
of which, Crime No. 111/2020 came to be registered for the offences
- 3 -
ba295.22.odt
punishable under Sections 420, 419, 465, 466, 467 of the Indian
Penal Code and under Sections 43, 66, 66(C), 66(D) of Information
Technology Act.
4.
Applicant came to be arrested on 25th October, 2020.
5.
Heard Shri Choudhari, learned counsel for the applicant
and Shri Narwade, leanred APP for the State.
6.
Learned counsel Shri Chudhari submits that applicant is
not the benefciary of the amount allegedly transferred from the
account of Axis Bank. He submits that the recovery which is effected
from the applicant i.e. laptop, mobile phones, Aadhar Cards, and
other articles do not indicate that they were used in the commission
of this offence. Simply on the basis of this recovery, the applicant
cannot be connected with the offence.
7.
Learned APP Shri Narwade submits that the applicant
has adopted similar modus operandi while committing offence in
other states also. He submits that similar modus operandi has been
followed by the applicant in the offences committed in Punjab,
- 4 -
ba295.22.odt
Hariyana and Delhi. He further submits that deposit receipt of one
of the benefciaries is found in the mobile handset of the applicant.
He submits that all these circumstances indicate that the applicant
will commit similar offence again if released on bail.
8.
Aadhar Cards, laptops, copies of PAN Cards, SIM Cards
in the name of various persons have been recovered from the
applicant. Unless it is shown that these Aadhar Cards and SIM
Cards were used for hacking bank account or for transferring the
amount, it cannot be said that the applicant was involved in the
commission of the alleged fraud. Even if it is accepted for the sake of
argument that the applicant was in touch with the accused persons,
it cannot