SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAMESHWAR GANPATI RAJEMOD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTREA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['NAGARGOJE ANKUSH N', 'V D HON', '', 'P D SURYANSHI']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2755 OF 2012

IN

FAST/2697/2012

GODHAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

VASIMODDIN SK.MAHEBOOB AND ORS

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Biradar R.D.

Mr. SP Dound, AGP for Respondent/State

-----

CORAM :

K.K.TATED, J.

DATE :

2 nd September,2014.

PER COURT :

1)

Heard learned counsel for applicant and

learned AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.

2)

This Civil Application is preferred by

acquiring body for stay of operation and

implementation of impugned Judgment and Award dated

30.09.2010 passed by the Reference Court in LAR

No.29/2010 (Old No.46/2003).

3)

Learned Counsel for applicant submits that

if the entire amount is recovered by the

respondent/original

claimant

in

Execution

application, nothing will survive in the present

First Appeal. He submits that in the interest of

justice, impugned order be stayed during pendency of

present First Appeal.

4)

I have heard learned counsel for applicant

and learned AGP. Considering the submissions made by

learned counsel for applicant and aft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top