RAMESHWAR GANPATI RAJEMOD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTREA AND OTHERS – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2755 OF 2012
IN
FAST/2697/2012
GODHAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, AURANGABAD
VERSUS
VASIMODDIN SK.MAHEBOOB AND ORS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Biradar R.D.
Mr. SP Dound, AGP for Respondent/State
-----
CORAM :
K.K.TATED, J.
DATE :
2 nd September,2014.
PER COURT :
1)
Heard learned counsel for applicant and
learned AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
2)
This Civil Application is preferred by
acquiring body for stay of operation and
implementation of impugned Judgment and Award dated
30.09.2010 passed by the Reference Court in LAR
No.29/2010 (Old No.46/2003).
3)
Learned Counsel for applicant submits that
if the entire amount is recovered by the
respondent/original
claimant
in
Execution
application, nothing will survive in the present
First Appeal. He submits that in the interest of
justice, impugned order be stayed during pendency of
present First Appeal.
4)
I have heard learned counsel for applicant
and learned AGP. Considering the submissions made by
learned counsel for applicant and aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.